Thanks Jordan for staring this thread! I'd love to hear from other people on this issue. I tend to be skeptical about the role of evidence in convincing people. I have been known to say that "evidence is very good at convincing people of things that they already basically agree with, but not so good at changing their minds." I also think that a lot of evidence already exists for many core DBER findings.
So, my question to the DBER community is, what can/should we be doing to convince our traditional disciplinary colleagues? Collect more evidence (what types?), Make existing evidence more easily digestible (in what ways?), Work on other persuasion channels (e.g., peers, institutional structures/pressures).
------------------------------
Charles Henderson
DBER-ALL
ASCN
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 04-28-2022 10:42 PM
From: Jordan Harshman
Subject: Tell us about why you joined the DBER community forum
I'll see if I can get the comments rolling - I am most excited about the individual efforts to set the standards of robustness for qualitative and quantitative methods in DBER. With robust methods, I'm hopeful - perhaps overly so - that we will be able to better convince our traditional disciplinary colleagues of the important findings that come from the DBER fields!
------------------------------
Jordan Harshman
Auburn AL
Original Message:
Sent: 04-13-2022 04:44 PM
From: Michael Feder
Subject: Tell us about why you joined the DBER community forum
Welcome to the DBER community forum. I am looking forward to getting to know all the DBER community members. Please respond to this post with an answer to either of these questions:
- What most excites you about recent DBER findings?
- What most excites you about your current DBER work?
------------------------------
Michael Feder, AAAS
He|Him
------------------------------